dictator Chavez! Liberator Chávez! I like the style! . Those are the terms on which the discussion arises about the socio-political process in Venezuela. Eleven years have expired since Chavez took office, and several elections and constitutional reforms in the middle.
For some media, for many years Cuba and Fidel Castro took the place of the devil, now no longer pays, the main promoter of the axis of evil became Venezuela and Chavez and Correa and Morales allies. It should
note that Venezuela is an oil country and everything it meant, means and mean. How does poverty in these eleven years? What progress (or not) social rights there? In many cases, these issues do not seem to matter to take a final position on the other hand, care more about the speech.
Three years into his presidency gave a coup attempt to stop the shift to the left of Venezuela (sounds like Honduras, no?) But a social explosion pushed so that the coup leaders were forced to make restitution, and even after having sworn the new "president." As president
feature particular it has, how to handle international diplomacy or at times non-diplomacy. This is very challenged, but sometimes it's nice to see that say certain things are. An example of this might just see when the killing of Israel on Palestine in late 2008. While several countries condemned the fact that very (too) politely, Chávez showed pictures of some of the many children killed in his TV show and talked about it. Hood that there is good in itself.
Instead of thinking about politics in terms of whether a person if a person or not, helps to deepen the discussion think about it in terms of whether this plan or this plan. Sometimes the names and faces are more symbols than anything else. Anyway it is good to renew the symbols. Sometimes not.
For some media, for many years Cuba and Fidel Castro took the place of the devil, now no longer pays, the main promoter of the axis of evil became Venezuela and Chavez and Correa and Morales allies. It should
note that Venezuela is an oil country and everything it meant, means and mean. How does poverty in these eleven years? What progress (or not) social rights there? In many cases, these issues do not seem to matter to take a final position on the other hand, care more about the speech.
Three years into his presidency gave a coup attempt to stop the shift to the left of Venezuela (sounds like Honduras, no?) But a social explosion pushed so that the coup leaders were forced to make restitution, and even after having sworn the new "president." As president
feature particular it has, how to handle international diplomacy or at times non-diplomacy. This is very challenged, but sometimes it's nice to see that say certain things are. An example of this might just see when the killing of Israel on Palestine in late 2008. While several countries condemned the fact that very (too) politely, Chávez showed pictures of some of the many children killed in his TV show and talked about it. Hood that there is good in itself.
Instead of thinking about politics in terms of whether a person if a person or not, helps to deepen the discussion think about it in terms of whether this plan or this plan. Sometimes the names and faces are more symbols than anything else. Anyway it is good to renew the symbols. Sometimes not.
0 comments:
Post a Comment